{"id":172,"date":"2019-07-09T23:40:47","date_gmt":"2019-07-09T23:40:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/billsnotes.net\/?p=172"},"modified":"2019-07-09T23:40:47","modified_gmt":"2019-07-09T23:40:47","slug":"roberts-discriminated-against-americans","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/billsnotes.net\/?p=172","title":{"rendered":"ROBERTS\u2019 DISCRIMINATED AGAINST AMERICANS"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\">Chief Justice Roberts\u2019 has discriminated against and disenfranchised American citizens with his opinion on the census citizenship question. It is true that the Constitution provides for counting \u201cpersons\u201d in the United States. The questions are (1) what is the purpose of the census and (2) the meaning of the word [American] \u201cpersons\u201d to accomplish that purpose. The adjective <\/span><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\">American is the same as \u201cyou\u201d understood in English grammar when the you isn\u2019t spoken in a sentence. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Calibri;\">The acknowledged purpose is for the apportionment of the members of the House of Representatives therefore it must be admitted that the term \u201cpersons\u201d was meant to mean American citizens as persons since the founders specifically excluded other persons from the census not then considered citizens such as American Indians that didn\u2019t pay taxes. Because of the structural ability to amend our Constitution these other \u201cpersons\u201d have been included as citizens (and rightly so). However illegal aliens have not been included as a group of citizens to be counted. This would also require a constitutional amendment to include illegal aliens as citizens. The use of the word \u201cpersons\u201d was a <i>restrictive description<\/i> of only those entitled to be counted for purposes of representation (not an all-inclusive term for all homosapiens). <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Calibri;\">Our founders realized the lack of logic and a rational purpose in apportioning members of Congress to a population of people that are not American citizens. The practice of including illegal aliens has led to great mischief with the federal system of taxes and benefits and, more importantly, the disenfranchisement of representation of American Citizens in Congress. There are approximately 6 members of Congress from California alone that are apportioned to California to represent illegal aliens \u2013 persons that are NOT Americans. These members of Congress are there solely because of the Illegal alien population in California. Those members of Congress are effectively representing a foreign country\u2019s interests by representing those persons obligated by nationality to a foreign country. Those Congressmen should be representing Americans! Saying that the term \u201cpersons\u201d applies to illegal aliens defies common sense. But sometimes common sense evades even the members of the Supreme Court. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Calibri;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">\u00a0The Roberts\u2019 opinion is a direct attack on our unalienable right to self-representation.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Calibri;\">Why should persons that are not Americans who have a birthright obligation to another country be entitled to have a member of Congress representing them? <\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp; Chief Justice Roberts\u2019 has discriminated against and disenfranchised American citizens with his opinion on the census citizenship question. It is true that the Constitution provides for counting \u201cpersons\u201d in the United States. The questions are (1) what is the purpose of the census and (2) the meaning of the word [American] \u201cpersons\u201d to accomplish&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/billsnotes.net\/?p=172\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">ROBERTS\u2019 DISCRIMINATED AGAINST AMERICANS<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/billsnotes.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/172"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/billsnotes.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/billsnotes.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/billsnotes.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/billsnotes.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=172"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/billsnotes.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/172\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":173,"href":"https:\/\/billsnotes.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/172\/revisions\/173"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/billsnotes.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=172"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/billsnotes.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=172"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/billsnotes.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=172"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}